Three Revolutionary Books

Confession: I can’t read just one book at a time. Maybe it’s an ADHD thing, but I generally have three or four books on my “currently reading” shelf at any given moment. However, it’s pretty rare for all of them to be this radical, this life-changing, at once.

The book I’m just finishing (and consequently have been reading longest) is Free Culture by Lawrence Lessig (he’s the guy who started “Creative Commons“). If you’ve ever illegally downloaded music from the internet, if you think Walt Disney was “original,” if you wonder whether or not it’s legal to Tivo your favorite show, or want to know why ASCAP sucks, you should read this book. Come to think of it, if you’ve ever produced anything creative in your life (a song, a painting, a poem, etc.) you should read this book. And you should be afraid of where our culture is headed. Lessig paints it like this:

Free culture is increasingly the casualty in this war on piracy … IN response to a real, if not yet quantified, threat that the technologies of the Internet present to twentieth-century business models for producing and distributing culture, the law and technology are being transformed in a way that will undermine our tradition of free culture … The opportunity to create and transform becomes weakened in a world in which creation requires permission and creativity must check with a lawyer.

The book I’m in the middle of reading is Shane Claiborne’s Irresistable Revolution: Living as an Ordinary Radical. I bought this book because someone at a conference told me I had to read it — apparently it would change my life. I’ve heard that line before, but I bought it anyhow. Then a few weeks later, David Bailey calls me from an airport and says, “Neal — drop everything you’re doing right now and go read this book. It will change your life.” This time I listened. They were both right. Last week I texted David and said, “You were right about the book. So when I go off the deep end, it will be partially your fault.” Claiborne calls for “Christians” to go beyond mere charity and distant, detached interactions with the social problems of our era:

Charity wins awards and applause, but joining the poor gets you killed. People do not get crucified for charity. People are crucified for living out a love that disrupts the social order, that calls forth a new world. People are not crucified for helping poor people. People are crucified for joining them.

It’s one thing to just think or say what he’s saying. I’ve done that plenty. But Shane Claiborne actually lives the way he talks, at an urban intentional community called The Simple Way. To me, this book and the ideas it contains could be the death and resurrection of the church, and possibly the world. And that would be a good thing.

The book I’m just starting is Pedagogy of the Oppressed, by Paulo Freire, a Brazilian Educator who lived through the Great Depression, and taught illiterate peasants in his country how to read — not just so they could “prosper,” but more importantly so they could fight against the wealthy and powerful forces that sought to control and marginalize them in the first place. I haven’t gotten too far into the book, but just enough to get really excited (and cram the margins with notes):

This then, is the great humanistic and historical task of the oppressed: to liberate themselves and their oppressors as well. The oppressors, who oppress, exploit, and rape by virtue of their power cannot find in this power the strength to liberate either the oppressed or themselves … In order to have the continued opportunity to express their “generosity,” the oppressors must perpetuate injustice as well. An unjust social order is the permanent fount of this “generosity,” which is nourished by death, despair, and poverty. That is why the dispensers of false generosity become desperate at the slightest threat to its source.

All three books challenge systems designed to keep the powerful powerful, and the rich rich — at the expense of freedom and opportunity: One from a technological/legal viewpoint, one from a sociological/theological viewpoint, and one from an educational/political viewpoint.

We love to *believe* that the words Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence — that “all men are created equal” — but but what we actually put into practice is more from George Orwell’s Animal Farm: “All are created equal, but some are more equal than others.” And those “others” will generally stop at nothing to keep it that way. I think this is why Jesus preached that the last shall be first and the first shall be last. He wasn’t talking about people’s souls, or people’s hearts. He was talking about their houses, and their jobs, and their titles, and their bank accounts. Shane Claiborne puts it this way: “True generosity is measured not by how much we give away, but by how much we have left.”

Vive la Revolution!

Posted in Books, Christianity, copyright, Education | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Mid-Blog-Life-Crisis?

If a blog can have a mid-life crisis (what’s the life expectancy of a blog, anyhow?) I think this blog is in the midst of one.

When I first registered the domain name “mrlocke.net,” I was a high school English teacher, and I used it to host a class website, where I posted assignments, resources, links, and other things relevant to the literature we studied. I called the website (duh?) “Mr. Locke’s Classroom.” You can still see what it looked like, using the internet Way Back Machine.

Then, in February 2004, my friend Annie introduced me to blogging (as she has done for many), and eventually I incorporated it into my class website, interacting with students through comments and through their own blogs I helped them start. I even got a nice write-up about it all in EdTech magazine. I like that we were on the cutting edge of blogs and education.

But then I left teaching (in body, although not in soul) to work in the church. I changed the tagline for my blog to “I will always be a teacher. I will always be a student.” This continues to be true, and education continues to be a passion of mine. At seminary, I will pursue both a Master of Divinity, and a Master of Education. But somehow, as my interests and passions have expanded, the title of the blog seems too narrow to convey what it’s about.

Come to think of it, what is this blog about?

If it is going to reflect who I am, what I do, and what is important to me, than it’s going to be about:

  • Open Source as an approach to software, computers, copyright, and technology, but also to life as well.
  • Folk Music and my attempts to create and spread music that belongs not just to me, but to the folks. Music that cries out on behalf of the oppressed and marginalized.
  • My pursuit of an Emerging Theology that is open-minded and revolutionary, as I journey through seminary and the process of becoming an ordained Presbyterian minister.
  • My stubmling path through Fatherhood, and the joys of watching my family grow.
  • And yes, Progressive Education that shatters ancient paradigms and sets captive students free.

In fact, if there is a vein that runs through all of this, I think it is freedom. Freedom from draconian copyright laws and the corporate tyranny of the music industry. Freedom from narrow, judgmental interpretations of the bible and hierarchical church structures that exclude rather than include. Freedom from parental stereotypes and the pressures a materialistic culture pushes on families. Freedom from an educational system that promotes conformity and fears critical thought. Freedom for the weak, the poor, the oppressed, the marginalized, the outcasts.

One of my favorite authors, Jean Jacques Rousseau, started his famous book on Education, Emile, with these simple words: “Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains.”

Unfortunately, the domains “unlocked.com,” “unlocked.net,” and “unlocked.org” are all taken. Any suggestions?

Posted in Blogging, Church, Education, Fatherhood, Folk, Open Source | Tagged , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Three-Year-Old Grammar Shark

My three-year-old son just corrected my grammar. He was right. I, the English major and former high-school English teacher, was wrong.

Grady: Daddy, somebody at school kicked my foot today.
Me: It’s ok, Grady. I’m sure they didn’t mean it.
Grady: No Daddy, it’s just one person.

He was referring, of course, to my usage of “they” as a pronoun to replace “somebody.” My pronoun was plural, and his antecedent was singular. Pronoun/antecedent agreement. Oldest mistake in the proverbial grammar book, and I was guilty as sin.

I realize that some people use “they” to refer to an antecedent for which the gender is unkown (as I did). Nevertheless, despite common usage, it’s still grammatically incorrect. Things I *could* have said?

  • It’s ok, Grady. I’m sure she or he didn’t mean it.
  • It’s ok, Grady. I’m sure your friend didn’t mean it.
  • It’s ok, Grady. I’m sure it wasn’t intentional.

Anyhow, as with much of parenting, I wasn’t quite sure whether to be embarrassed, indignant, or proud. I’m posting it on my blog, so I must be proud. Now when he’s 15 and does it on a regular basis…then it won’t be quite so cute.

Posted in English I, Fatherhood, Grady, Humor | Tagged | 1 Comment

Spanish Inquisition…Presbyterian Style

I’ve been writing a lot in the past few weeks, just not for my blog, unfortunately.

As some of you know, I’m in the process of becoming an ordained minister in the Presbyterian Church (USA). To be accepted as an inquirer (phase 1 of the ordination process), I have to jump through a few hoops. One of those is a psychological evaluation, performed by a counselor hired by my presbytery (that’s the regional governing body for the denomination).

I expected to do a lot of writing (and did) when I applied to seminary. I even expected to do a lot of writing when I applied to the presbytery become an inquirer. I even expect to do a lot of writing when I’m *in* seminary, and to be thoroughly grilled by my presbytery’s committee on preparation for ministry, several times.

But I didn’t expect this:

The shrink wants me to answer a *few* questions (see below) before he’ll schedule an appointment with me. He wants them in writing. Silly me — I thought his job was to *talk* to me, and ask me some of these things in person. And I never expected that he would require more writing than Princeton Seminary, Grace Presbytery, and all my blog posts for the past year combined! And the questions border on ridiculous! Is this a Jedi-mind game to find out how much bureaucracy a potential minister will put up with? Or how obedient I’ll be? Please, if you have gone through this process, let me know if your experience was similar, or if this guy just takes himself waaaaaay to seriously…

  • What is your current marital status and your marital history?
  • If currently married, what is your spouse’s name and occupation?
  • Do you have children? If so, indicate their name, age, grade in school and any special circumstances like adoption, step children, from a previous marriage, etc.
  • Family of Origin- List all the members of your family of origin (including parents, step parents, siblings, step siblings, etc.) and indicate their name, sex, age (or age at death) and occupation. Include yourself at the appropriate place in the birth order.

Ok. So far so good — I have no great objection to any of these questions, and can easily see the validity in them.

  • Have you had any operations or hospitalizations (type and date)?
  • Have you had other illnesses (nature and date)?
  • Have you had a thorough physical exam in the last two years? If so, what were the results?
  • What kind of exercise or recreation do you do (type and frequency)?
  • Are you currently taking any prescription medications (name and reason for taking)?
  • Are you currently taking any over the counter medication (name and reason for taking)?
  • Do you have hearing or vision problems (Explain)?
  • Do you have a pattern or history of smoking or tobacco use?
  • Do you drink alcoholic beverages? If so, with what frequency?
  • Have you ever thought you should cut down?
  • Has anyone ever suggested that you should drink less?
  • What time do you normally go to sleep and wake up?
  • Do you have any problems with sleep (getting to sleep, staying asleep, waking too early, sleep apnea, etc.)?
  • Do you have any health issues that could affect your ability to work in any way? Explain.

Medical questions? Wait a minute…I thought this was a psychological exam. Is that really his job? I could *maybe* see the Presbytery wanting to know how healthy I am, but are all of these questions really necessary to assess that?

  • Do you have any of the following symptoms regularly or severely enough to cause you concern? Chest pain, Concentration, Fatigue, Heart rate, Interest in sex, Painful intercourse, Perspiration, Sexual arousal, Shortness of breath, Urination, Weight changes, Dizziness, Fainting, Black outs, Seizures, Abdominal pain, Diarrhea, Constipation, Allergies, ADHD, Headaches, Blood pressure, Cholesterol, Obesity

Interest in Sex?????? Perspiration?????? Concentration?????? Oh yes. I have concentration regularly enough to cause me concern…

  • Have you ever experienced any of the following symptoms?Sadness, Loss of interest, Loss of pleasure, Sleep problems, Concentration, Fatigue, Irritability, Self-criticism, Wanting to be alone, Weight changes, Appetite loss, Thoughts of self-harm, Interest in sex, Decision making, Hopelessness, Pessimism, Chest pain, Heart rate, Panic attack, Shortness of breath, Perspiration, Urination, Sweating, Shaking, Nausea, Dizziness, Fear of losing control, Anxiety, Unwanted thoughts, Fear of going crazy, Repetitive hand washing, Other repetitive behavior, Feeling detached, Traumatic events, Sexual, abuse, Verbal abuse, Eating disorder, Sexual dysfunction, Emotional numbness, Explosive temper, Unusual thoughts, Excessive Worry, Impulse control, Pedophilia

Ok, first of all, that “pedophilia” seems tacked on like it was added on just in the last few years. That’s actually a pretty sad statement about the church. But other than that, who HASN’T experienced most of the things on this list? Ooops. Guess “pessimism” just got the better of me again…This test is giving me “unwanted thoughts.” And what does that mean if I DON’T experience the symptom “interest in sex?” That I would make a good Catholic priest?????

  • Have you ever sought counseling with your pastor or a pastoral counselor? If so, when and for what reason?
  • Have you ever consulted a mental health professional? If so, when and for what reason?
  • Have you ever been hospitalized for mental or emotional reasons? If so, explain.
  • Is there any history of emotional illness (suicide, depression, bipolar disorder, eating disorder, etc) or alcohol or drug abuse in your family (grandparents, aunts, uncles, parents, siblings)? If so, detail below?
  • Have you ever been suspected of sexual misconduct or the subject of a sexual misconduct charge?
  • Do you have a criminal history? Describe.

Not Yet, Mr. Shrink. Not yet…

  • Year finished high school:
  • Please list all education since high school:
  • What subjects do you enjoy?

My favorite subject in school was doing busywork for teachers who most likely would never even read what I had written…NOT!

  • List all major job experiences since high school including dates, employer and type of position. Rate your overall level of satisfaction from 1 (very low) to 10 (very high).
  • List, beginning with the first, the communities you have lived in and your religious affiliation.
  • Describe your mother.
  • Describe your father.
  • Describe yourself.
  • Describe your current life situation.
  • Describe your current plans and goals for work.
  • Reflect on your experience of childhood (birth through high school).
  • Reflect on your experience during the high school years.
  • Reflect on your experience during college and the years following to the present.

He could have just said, “Write your freakin’ autobiography from start to finish. Be sure to list what you had for breakfast…EVERY DAY OF YOUR @#$@# LIFE!”

  • Describe your sense of call to ministry.

Let’s see…I feel called to sit at a computer screen all day long and type out my life story so someone can decide if I’m “normal” enough to do what fishermen, tax collectors, tent-makers and prostitutes did 2000 years ago…

  • Describe your family of origin including economic status, emotional climate, illnesses, separations, divorce, place in the community, etc.
  • What specific tasks would you like to do in ministry?

How ’bout overhaul the ordination process for starters? Or at least give applicants two or three psychologists to choose from?

  • What issues in the church and the world would you like to address in your work?

I won’t be able to!! I’ll still be filling out this questionnaire 30 years from now!!!

  • What are the five most significant events of your life in terms of shaping your character, goals, values, philosophy and theology?
  • What five skills do you bring to ministry? Give a specific example of when that skill has been demonstrated.

    Hmmm…patience? Filling out an excessively long questionnaire for a psychological examination?

    • What skills or attributes do you need to develop in order to excel in ministry?

    Dang. Obviously a little more tolerance, patience, and a twisted sense of humor. Give me serenity, St. Francis (or maybe courage to change what I can).

    • Estimate the amount of time you spent on this questionnaire.

    How about two wasted weeks of my life, NOT spent with my family, NOT spent doing ministry, answering BUSYWORK questions that I COULD have answered in person?

    Careful, Neal. If I go crazy trying to complete a psychological evaluation, wouldn’t that be ironic?

    Oh, and did I mention that I also have to pay this guy for the privilege of talking to him after I’ve answered his questions? And that he wants three letters of recommendation? And I have to take a 400 question personality test? Universal Life Church, here I come…

    Posted in Church, Humor, Questions, Rants, Writing | Tagged | 12 Comments

    Homeland Insecurities

    Homeland Security Seal
    Two news stories caught my attention today:

    1. It appears that a British citizen of Arabic descent (who also happens to be a member of Parliament) was detained at Dulles Airport and actually had his luggage checked for explosives. The irony here is that he was traveling to America specifically to talk about defeating terrorism, AND was INVITED by the department of Homeland Security!
    2. Apparently, Finnish folk musicians are a threat to the country as well. At the Minneapolis-St.Paul International Airport, Jukka Karjalainen (the “Bruce Springsteen” of Finland) and two fellow musicians were detained and humiliated for two hours:

      An ICE agent approached the long-haired male musician and began jabbing his finger into the poor guy’s face and screaming, “You’re a criminal! Don’t deny it! We know you’re a criminal!” The musician, whose English is limited, tried to explain what he was doing in the country, but to no avail. The agent went on with the tantrum.

      But wait — it gets better:

      Perhaps the most damning comment on the incident was delivered by the Finn who was strip-searched. On a couple of occasions prior to 1991, he was detained by the KGB and interrogated. Compared to the ICE agents here in the Twin Cities, the KGB operatives, he says, “at least acted like human beings. Not a bunch of animals.”

    Look away, Lady Liberty. Look away.

    Posted in Current Events, Folk, Immigration, Rants | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

    Fat Church

    Ok, so my last church metaphor ruffled a few feathers, for better or worse. This one is perhaps less controversial (maybe less original, too) but still worth thinking about. It starts with a familiar metaphor from the bible itself: The church as the “body” of Christ. A body that is made up of individual members. And we want to be a healthy body, right?

    So, imagine the following conversation:

    RICK: Dude, have you heard about Joel? He’s been growing like crazy lately.

    BILL: Yeah, I saw him just the other day. He’s HUGE! He must be 400 pounds, at least.

    RICK: I wonder what his secret is. I mean, how can I grow that big?

    BILL: Funny you should ask — he’s putting on a seminar next weekend. It’s all about things you can do to get bigger, faster. Like, one thing he says is that you should consume any food that you come across, even if it belongs to someone else.

    RICK: Wow. That’s deep. Hey, do you think there’s such a thing as “too big?”

    BILL: Don’t be silly. Growing is what healthy bodies do, so the more you grow, the healthier you must be. I’m hoping someday I can break 500 pounds. That would be awesome!

    RICK: Hey, then you could host your own “growth” seminar. Maybe you could even write a book…

    Posted in Christianity, Church, Humor, Rants | 4 Comments

    Oral Roberts University President Steps Down

    Richard Roberts Wow. My Alma Matter is in the news today: (thanks for the heads-up, Trait!)

    Oral Roberts University President Richard Roberts issued a written statement on Wednesday saying he is taking an indefinite leave of absence, following intense scrutiny spawned by financial, political and other allegations raised in a lawsuit.

    This announcement comes eight days after Roberts said on national television: “I have not done anything wrong for which I needed to step aside.”

    Billy Joe Daugherty, pastor of Victory Christian Center, has been named executive regent and will lead the university while Roberts is on leave, said George Pearsons, chairman of ORU’s board of regents.

    On one hand, I’m astonished. For the first time *ever* a non-Roberts is at the helm of the university. Personally, I think it should have been that way from the beginning. But on the other hand, it’s Billy Joe Daugherty — possibly the most like-minded-evangelical-loyalist-minister-from-right-across-the-street they could have found. And apparently, Richard is still living in the mansion, getting paid, and calling the shots for all the related non-university ministries.

    Obviously, I’m not qualified to pass judgment on the allegations. Oh, heck with that, yes I am. The deeper they dig in this investigation, the more twisted and illegal activity they’ll find. During my last year at ORU, I was the student body president — I ran on an “anti-administration” platform (because I thought the university was irresponsible with student money, among other things). When I was elected, rather than address the concerns of the students who had put me in office, the administration immediately took steps to isolate me and cut off my access to people and sources of information that were granted to both my predecessors and those who succeeded me. Gee — I wonder why they did that?

    I’ve also watched them (and by “them” I mean Lindsay Roberts, who holds no official position in the University) repeatedly fire qualified administrators throughout the years the second they raised any legitimate concerns about the Roberts family. All were immediately replaced by extreme loyalists. I think George W. Bush must’ve studied the leadership and management technique of ORU before he took office. Come to think of it, there are a lot of similarities between Richard and George. Except I think George Bush is more open, honest, and responsible, and oh my God — did I just say that???

    I’d better stop before I get too worked up, here. And I was doing so good with my “ORU bitterness recovery” the last few years…

    UPDATE: Richard Roberts has officially and permanently resigned, and the board of regents has voted to officially separate (legally and financially) ORU from the Oral Roberts Evangelistic Assocation (basically, the Roberts family ministry organization). This is great news! A new era begins, and I hope ORU will rise to the occasion. You can read up to date coverage here.

    Posted in Christianity, College, Rants | Tagged , , , | 9 Comments